Zillow claims "we have an obligation to protect the interest of the copyright holders". If that obligation is contractual, they are acting as the agent of the c

Zillow claims "we have an obligation to protect the interest of the copyright holders". If that obligation is contractual, they are acting as the agent of the copyright holder and should have the right to take legal action on their behalf. In fact they might be compelled to take legal action, even if that action puts them in a poor light as it does in this case. This is where I think Techdirt is missing the picture.