> It’s not entirely clear why the University of Washington team gets such a weird result — since their data isn’t public, we can’t check it — but it’s worth not

> It’s not entirely clear why the University of Washington team gets such a weird result — since their data isn’t public, we can’t check it — but it’s worth noting at least two important issues with their study. I cannot understand how economic studies are supposed to be credible when the data they use is not provided along with their methodology. Is this for privacy reasons? If so, surely we can come up with obfuscation standards?