4 ms·
Why would a representative leave so much influence in the hands of a girl in her middle twenties who's dumb enough to doll out influence to bringers of chocolat
by 2845197541 9y ago
Why would a representative leave so much influence in the hands of a girl in her middle twenties who's dumb enough to doll out influence to bringers of chocolate?
- nojvek 9y agoAll girls in their mid 20's are dumb. Thanks for the relevation. Also all the power they have is of scheduling. Not making laws.
- 2845197541 9y agoI didn't say all girls in their mid 20's are dumb. It's been suggested in the post above that scheduling is where the power lies.
- TrashSoup 9y agoBut are they aware they have this much power? I'd imagine someone in their mid 20's who is easily swayed by chocolate and restaurant suggestions doesn't understand the full gravity of what their position entails. They may not necessarily be dumb, but it does sound like they're minimally naive.
- 2845197541 9y agoI'd say them not being aware makes them dumb. Like how can you not have a clue in that position and chase chocolates. You're mid-twenties, fully grown, and dumb.
- namlem 9y agoManipulating people with favors is easy, even if they're very intelligent. The schedulers are likely not even giving favorable treatment consciously. The chocolate or whatever simply serves to build a positive association with the name of the person who will be calling to ask for a meeting later.
- urethrafranklin 9y agoWhat's dumb about it? It's called greasing the wheel. You want to get the meeting over every other asshole who wants a meeting. Who gets the meeting, gets the laws.
- 2845197541 9y agoThe girl is dumb for playing loose with American legislation for fucking chocolates.
- urethrafranklin 9y agoThis whole phenomenon is over your head, isn't it?
- caseysoftware 9y agoIt's not dumb at all. It's helping people who are polite and considerate to you. If every interaction you have with someone is positive, when they ask for a small favor that is 100% part of your job anyway, of course you say yes.
- abiox 9y agothe question seems reductive enough to be a nonsequitur.