3 ms·
It seems to be a bit content-free, with pop-up ads, and lacking attribution from what I can tell. However, if no other reference is available, I will certainly
by abawany 9y ago
It seems to be a bit content-free, with pop-up ads, and lacking attribution from what I can tell. However, if no other reference is available, I will certainly look at its information over the various other persons that infest the web with fake medical fiction. EDIT: for example, http://www.webmd.com/lung/tc/tuberculosis-tb-topic-overview#1 http://www.webmd.com/lung/tc/tuberculosis-tb-topic-overview#... - if you have never visited WebMD or hit this page using incognito, it will hit you with a pop-up ad within 5 seconds.
EDIT2: An under-rated site is the Merck Manual. Their corresponding page for the consumer edition is thus: https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/infections/tuberculosis-and-leprosy/tuberculosis-tb https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/infections/tuberculosis-an... .