4 ms·
'05 Annual Performance Review: Albert Einstein
- sleazebreeze 9y agoMaybe my sense of humor is broken, but none of this is real and I was disappointed by that - I had expected a genuine performance review. It also spends a lot of time talking about his published papers and none at all about what he did at the patent office. His boss at the patent office wouldn't have given two hoots if he had co-authors on his papers.
- rietta 9y agoCompletely agree. I was disappointed to see otherwise and bailed after the first few paragraphs.
- killjoywashere 9y agoHow many patent applications did Einstein in fact analyse in 1905? Presumably 1904 could have been a little dicey as well.
- lngnmn 9y agoBTW, the time part of "On The Electrodynamics" is nonsense ;) The notion of simultaneous with hands of a watch and beams of light makes no sens, because everything is simultaneous due to the nature of the universe. The notions of time itself, past and future require an observer to be formulated, and does not have any existence whatsoever.