3 ms·
I love weird old computing dead ends like this. Pretty good ideas at the wrong time and place in history to allow them to take off. I mean, no mouse in 1987? Ta
by SwellJoe 9y ago
I love weird old computing dead ends like this. Pretty good ideas at the wrong time and place in history to allow them to take off. I mean, no mouse in 1987? Task-focused rather than general purpose? I remember reading about them when they were new; Amiga was my obsession by then (though I couldn't afford one for another couple years), but I devoured all the computing media I could get my hands on. They seemed like a toy, to me, and a very expensive one, to boot.
It's cool to imagine what the world would have looked like had we gone down different paths. If this had come a year or two earlier, been a few hundred dollars cheaper, maybe we'd be using a very different sort of computer today. But, probably not. The GUI/mouse interface has been an unbeatable monster for decades now. The windowing GUI may have just been delayed by a year or two. Nerds (myself included) kinda pine for the pre-mouse days now and then, but even so, I don't know a lot of people who use an exclusively text-based UI. I like a tiled window manager and a text editor that's most controllable via keyboard, but I also like having a mouse.
- tyingq 9y agoI didn't use this one, but the somewhat similar Wang dedicated word processors were pretty nice to work with, and pretty successful until PCs and (mostly) Wordstar wiped them out. Wordstar, no mouse needed, thrived for quite a while as well.
- Joeri 9y agoGeorge R.R. Martin still uses wordstar to write his books.
- nullc 9y agoI'm sure at least a few people here use joe -- with its wordstar like control commands-- as their editor of choice today.
- digi_owl 9y agoDug joe back up recently after not having touched it in ages. And the first thing that caught me off guard is that unlike most exit prompts, answering Y throws changes away...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]