4 ms·
I agree with all but your first sentence... I think you are just underestimating what topics can have peer reviewed scientific papers written about them. http:
by cde-v 9y ago
I agree with all but your first sentence... I think you are just underestimating what topics can have peer reviewed scientific papers written about them.
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S235197891500013X/1-s2.0-S235197891500013X-main.pdf?_tid=9c9e77a6-5b80-11e7-88b4-00000aacb35d&acdnat=1498599540_9ad3fe6ba882e11ce5159248902cb301 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S235197891500013X/1-s2.0-S235197891500...
I was more taking a shot at the companies who do a redesign/facelift of their website/customer portal, or a bank struggling to integrate an off the shelf trading tool into their systems.
- gamblor956 9y agoI'm not sure what you're getting at. The first is a clear example of a permissible R&D credit activity if it otherwise satisfies the 4 requirements, and courts have found that the second activity generally would also be permissible for R&D credits if the integration involved additional software development by the bank (though this is more of a facts-based determination).
- tyrw 9y agoIf you're agreeing with gamblor, you're doing it in a way that sounds completely different and much narrower than what they're suggesting. My take from your parent comment was "don't bother", and my take from gamblor was "this is very doable". Pretty big difference.