3 ms·
That's awfully cynical. The answer they got is more indicative of the fact that they're talking to a representative rather than one of the engineers who would h
by eridius 9y ago
That's awfully cynical. The answer they got is more indicative of the fact that they're talking to a representative rather than one of the engineers who would have actually been responsible for fuzzing it, so all the representative can really do is say what the policy is rather than answer the specific question of "was this particular component fuzzed"?
- 888uuii 9y agoWe live in a society presently governed by anarchic advertising and mass-hypnosis. Cynical is called-for.
- frandroid 9y agoA good PR representative doesn't want to get caught flat-footed, and usually gets all the information they need from inside sources so that they can bullshit properly without (accidentally) misleading the public and causing the company legal trouble. Microsoft can afford good PR staff. If they didn't say yes, than the answer is probably no.