4 ms·
This is cool, but one thing that may be useful is a "last commit" instead of "Last Update". Explaining what is looked at for "last update" that would be great t
by elliotpage 9y ago
This is cool, but one thing that may be useful is a "last commit" instead of "Last Update".
Explaining what is looked at for "last update" that would be great too.
Some repos that I follow that are very dead have a very recent "last update" as they are still hammered by people due to being high up in search engine results and linked to from lots of places.
- onli 9y agoCase in point is http://forked.yannick.io/flot/flot http://forked.yannick.io/flot/flot and https://github.com/flot/flot https://github.com/flot/flot. Dead project with seemingly no active forks, listed being updated 2 month ago. Last commit was in 2014.
- fyskij 9y agoI think that the most important missing feature is number of commits of the fork
- masukomi 9y agonumber of commits on the fork is irrelevant to the stated coal "find MAINTAINED forks..." if you had 400 extra commits, but they were 6 years ago i don't care. it's very unlikely to be a "maintained" fork.
- davidw 9y agoWhat you'd want is consistency over time together with the most recent commit.