3 ms·
> So when Amazon decided to sell hardware, would that be anti-competitive? Which monopoly does Amazon have that they're abusing to sell hardware? > Pretty muc
by UnoriginalGuy 9y ago
> So when Amazon decided to sell hardware, would that be anti-competitive?
Which monopoly does Amazon have that they're abusing to sell hardware?
> Pretty much, you could use the argument you just made against any business that delved into another space.
Nope; only businesses which are a monopoly.
Amazon has no monopoly, therefore the argument cannot be used against them. Plus nobody is stopping Google from opening a new website (e.g. GoogleShopCompare.com) and doing anything they want, using their huge brand and financial power, what they're saying is wrong is embedding it into their existing monopolistic property to give it an unfair advantage (Google.com).
It is exactly comparable to the Microsoft/Windows issues in the 1990s. Microsoft could sell/give away IE, they just couldn't bundle it with their monopoly (Windows) to give it an unfair advantage. Google previously got into trouble for exactly this due to Google Maps being bundled with Google.com.
- ApolloFortyNine 9y agoDefine monopoly, Google is the largest search engine, Amazon is the largest eretailer. Personally I don't think Google has a monopoly, as there are alternatives (a monopoly is supposed to be when their exist no competitors, not just when a business is so much better than everyone else that people choose to use them). Plus, switching search engines takes literally seconds. Amazon used to only push other's products, now they push their own as well, often making use of their front page to do so. It's the same, if not worse, than what Google is doing.
- tripzilch 9y agoThe term "market domination" is actually the one under consideration with this ruling. Previous time this happening with Microsoft, they just happened to also be a monopoly. "Market domination" is in fact defined in the article (and in more specific detail if you follow the links there).
- ApolloFortyNine 9y agoI believe I said monopoly, not market domination. Thanks though.