4 ms·
> winbindd ... I recently noticed that SSSD is available on rather a lot of Linux distros and is well respected. Must have a look. Yeah definitely ditch winbin
by noinsight 9y ago
> winbindd ... I recently noticed that SSSD is available on rather a lot of Linux distros and is well respected. Must have a look.
Yeah definitely ditch winbindd and use SSSD. SSSD makes doing this really easy and works really well.
- jabl 9y agoYes. Except on samba servers, on those you really really want to run winbindd.
- Spivak 9y agoAre you using Samba as a DC in this situation? Because I can't think of a reason you would have to ditch SSSD to set up file shares.
- jabl 9y agoNo, just as a AD member server. Without winbindd, samba has to fall back to the libc pam/nss functionality which is not as full-featured as the one provided by winbindd. So there's some performance benefits which might or might not matter for you, but there's also some cases that don't work at all without winbindd; at least we were unable to allow non-domain clients (e.g. personal laptops) access to a smb share without winbindd. If you dig into this topic you can find mails from samba core devs on samba-technical saying that you REALLY should run winbind for a samba AD member server.