> They're claiming ToS violation. They did say that. But the true nature of their actions are intimidating an under-funded adversary who actually does have fai

> They're claiming ToS violation. They did say that. But the true nature of their actions are intimidating an under-funded adversary who actually does have fair use rights to criticize their work. Think of the slippery slope- TOS of car, can't complain about defects, TOS of prescription drug, can't say grandpa died while using it as noted in the side effects of the drug. And that's why the courts have shot down these "TOS trumps the First Amendment" cases every time.