3 ms·
> It's 30-40% of the population that opposes the token non-solutions that have been proposed by liberal governments. The primary solution (emissions trading) i
by flukus 9y ago
> It's 30-40% of the population that opposes the token non-solutions that have been proposed by liberal governments.
The primary solution (emissions trading) is a conservative solution, not a liberal one. Reagan and Thatcher introduced the Montreal protocol (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Protocol) to limit CFC emissions. Bush senior introduced the Acid Rain Program (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_Rain_Program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_Rain_Program) to limit sulfur emissions.
Aside from that, if the conservatives would like to propose a new solution then I and most other people are all ears, but all we seem to get is denial that the problem exists.
- incompatible 9y ago"Conservative" is a somewhat meaningless term in this context. On one hand, it's conservative to continue with business as usual and ignore potential problems until they become unavoidable. However, it would also be conservative to keep CO2 levels in the atmosphere at their current levels, instead of running a radical climate experiment in which they are pumped up to ever higher levels.
- flukus 9y agoThe point is that it's not some big Liberal conspiracy that the OP and many others believe. It's not even a liberal idea.