3 ms·
I feel like that is different though. In-fact, that transition increased innovation capability in my view as someone who wrote some of the largest reaching on-c
by carlosdp 9y ago
I feel like that is different though. In-fact, that transition increased innovation capability in my view as someone who wrote some of the largest reaching on-campus applications at CMU during my time there.
Andrew was pretty dated and virtually everyone I knew was already forwarding their emails through their Gmail anyways. Transitioning to Google Apps was basically cutting out the middle-man while adding on some interesting functionality.
1. Now everyone also had a better calendar system and file sharing with Google Drive within the CMU namespace. This meant that clubs, for example, could create Google Forms that were restricted to actual CMU students with CMU email addresses, and they could use that guarantee to do more interesting things like adding information from the Directory on top of those emails without having to ask for it (such as Major and School).
2. We also got a way to allow people to use their Andrew logins on any student-made website with simple OAuth2 that restricted to using the @andrew.cmu.edu emails on Google Accounts. Before this, apps like ScheduleMan and the StuGov apps (which I developed on when I was there) had to get special permission to use Shibboleth and there were a bunch of restrictions for having those certs including having to run on CMU infrastructure.
Now, any student can create applications with the same login guarantees of only being accessed by CMU students and allow for one-click login and registration (since most relevant information can be obtained by looking up their email in the Directory), vastly increasing the usability of these apps.
In my view, that transition was definitely a net-positive to the CMU ecosystem, in both usability and development.