3 ms·
Yes, but the 'why' of his preference is important here. Preferring something to avoid pain or death doesn't lead to net positive transactions, in general. If
by clavalle 9y ago
Yes, but the 'why' of his preference is important here. Preferring something to avoid pain or death doesn't lead to net positive transactions, in general.
If I ask you whether you want your leg or your left hand cut off (and I have the power to make either happen) you can have a preference and still lose.
- SamReidHughes 9y ago> Preferring something to avoid pain or death doesn't lead to net positive transactions, in general. Actually, it does. Because avoiding pain or death, in a preferable way, is by definition a net positive. > If I ask you whether you want your leg or your left hand cut off (and I have the power to make either happen) you can have a preference and still lose. That's not the shape of the example here. The employer isn't the only job in town, and the employer didn't impose a situation of joblessness on the guy. There are other employers he could do menial low-trust work for. The answer of imposing a minimum wage, by the way, means you get your leg and hand cut off.