I used scare quotes to indicate that it isn't an actual law, which is also why I said that it's weaker than something like F=MA and that economics ain't physics

I used scare quotes to indicate that it isn't an actual law, which is also why I said that it's weaker than something like F=MA and that economics ain't physics. Then you chose to ignore all of that to accuse me of pretending otherwise. I don't deny that there are exceptions, I just claim that they _are_ exceptions, and that therefore the burden of proof is on the one arguing that a particular case is exceptional.