5 ms·
.
by CiPHPerCoder 9y ago
.
- hirundo 9y ago> then the study is just measuring toxicity rather than bad policy. Don't you think that good policy should account for human toxicity? You seem to believe that policy should not account for "human folly."
- thehardsphere 9y agoOk, your moralizing tone is condescending, it is rude to pretend to "ask questions" when you're really pushing a thesis, and the thesis you are presenting has no explanatory power. Thus addressing those "questions" is largely uninteresting.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- throwanem 9y agoI suspect you're getting downvoted, and not getting replied to, because > the jobs [being] cut because of the collective actions of spiteful business owners who don't wish to pay their employees that much per hour ...just doesn't make any kind of sense. You might find an occasional individual small business owner who's willing to cut off his nose to spite his face in this fashion. To imagine it happening on a collective basis, whether in organized or spontaneous fashion, is fantastically absurd, and seems necessarily rooted in so little experience of actual business proprietors that it's hard to imagine any kind of productive conversation proceeding from this point.