Yeah. While I think they have pretty good product, they have the reality distortion field turned up to 11. It permeates everybody who deals with them -- includi

Yeah. While I think they have pretty good product, they have the reality distortion field turned up to 11. It permeates everybody who deals with them -- including at times their own staff. What I'd really like to know is how they score these interviews and exposes on them? They read like a marketing insert ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125200842406984303.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125200842406984303.html ). The consensus among people I know is that they are paying gobs of money to the owners of these papers to get this kind of coverage. Why run a half page add when you can get the paper to just send a reporter out to your office to give you a favorable writeup with pictures of the CEO looking impossibly cool and not even bother to interview the end users of the software who might have something negative to say?