4 ms·
So it is mosh, but much better? I'll try it.
by fiatjaf 9y ago
So it is mosh, but much better? I'll try it.
- fiatjaf 9y agoThe PPA doesn't work. The compilation instructions fail.
- JosephRedfern 9y agoCompilation works for me: https://asciinema.org/a/LkPYDdWkGgFybny8ChqOLQA8e https://asciinema.org/a/LkPYDdWkGgFybny8ChqOLQA8e What problems are you encountering? It might be worth opening a GitHub issue.
- fiatjaf 9y agoIt is not clear from the error that you were missing libsodium. I don't remember what was my error anyway, I'll try again later. But I can't even find libsodium on my apt.
- JosephRedfern 9y agoAgreed, it wasn't terribly clear. I essentially just guessed based on the mention of "sodium_LIBRARY_RELEASE". What OS are you running?
- Digitalghost 9y agoHey, please file an issue on github: https://github.com/MisterTea/EternalTCP/issues https://github.com/MisterTea/EternalTCP/issues You may be running a distro that doesn't have libsodium (such as ubuntu 14). In this case you have to grab libsodium manually and build et from source.
- jitl 9y agoTo me this seems like Mosh, but worse. I think that each project's approach has different strengths. For me, the best part of Mosh is the intelligent, asynchronous handling of type-ahead. Mosh feels really snappy, even over poor connections. I'm not bothered by needing to run Tmux on the remote for scrollback; I do that anyways, and I have no need for this fancy "control center" mode. My big frustration with both Mosh and ET is that neither expose a data communication channel along side the PTY. I use SSH for port forwarding, Tmux paste buffer sync, file transfer, and SSH agent forwarding. Without those features, I'll always need to use SSH/Autossh along side these tools for my other SSH use cases.