4 ms·
nothing wrong with being that guy but at the same time there's also nothing wrong with admitting you don't know what something is before you go and look it up.
by ozzmotik 9y ago
nothing wrong with being that guy but at the same time there's also nothing wrong with admitting you don't know what something is before you go and look it up. i don't want to be that guy but the poster you responded to didn't ask what they were, only stated that they don't know what they are. im sure if they were curious enough and thought it relevant enough to their knowledge base they would go look it up of their own accord.
also, another point I'd really like to bring up is, while in general im comfortable with doing research and learning something from resources on the web, some people are less confident in their abilities to understand something and would prefer to ask another human being to explain it so they can open up the possibility of discussion if they don't particularly understand the verbiage or concepts contained within the answer; it's much easier to ask a person a question than to ask an article or a tutorial one when said resource may not even be actively maintained or monitored anymore and social interaction may have potentially died down on it.
im not trying to really complain as I do believe everyone should really take the time to do their own research and come to their own conclusions, but having someone they can ask is useful in and of itself in the same way having a professor in college you can ask to clarify is being useful. if you don't have another individual that is knowledgeable about the concepts you're unsure about your perception of to potentially confirm or deny your conclusions, then you're basically operating on unknown unknowns, and as far as I understand, in intellectual practice, it is the desire of the practitioner to eliminate any possible unknown unknowns through whatever means necessary and account for all possibilities and deviations.
but yeah, Google first then ask questions!
- k__ 9y agoSure, problem is when you 'think' you know something, but you don't, as I thought type classes are equivalent to variants :D