4 ms·
I'm starting to get to the point where I wish people weren't allowed to call advertising supported products "free." I don't know what other term would be better
by beefsack 9y ago
I'm starting to get to the point where I wish people weren't allowed to call advertising supported products "free." I don't know what other term would be better, but I feel like users are paying some non-monetary cost.
- Iv 9y ago"adware" works for me. Brainshareware is more accurate but it is a mouthful.
- candiodari 9y agoThis is adware like popover ads used to be on the web. You know, the ones you couldn't get to the background.
- fnayr 9y agoApple changed apps with In App Purchases from being able to say "Free" to "Get." Maybe they'll do the same with ad supported apps as well.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- jooize 9y agoDoes any app have “Free” on the download button now?
- ClassyJacket 9y agoJust noting that they changed that for all apps, even truly free ones with no ads or purchases.
- paulie_a 9y agoThat is why I am starting to randomly click on ads simply so they waste the money and get a lesser ROI and scewed stats.
- Bakary 9y agoSince it's a skinner box, why not call it skinnerware?
- patrec 9y agoUsers are (on average) clearly paying some monetary cost as well, otherwise the business model would not make sense. So rather than paying X to get a product, you now pay some Y >> X, plus the additional annoyance and wasted time.
- izacus 9y agoWell, Play Store does explicitly mark the app as contaning ads.
- benologist 9y agoGoogle has invented such a narrow definition of 'not-advertising' that the label cannot distinguish between apps bundling countless third-parties vs someone linking directly to their own website in the game-ending credits. https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/6334373?visit_id=1-636341001126471625-1449405421&p=ads&rd=1#ads https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...
- skocznymroczny 9y agofreemium?