27 ms·
The grsecurity team does have some valid criticisms of the upstream community, and of course they've done some brilliant technical work, but spender is unfortun
by ajdlinux 9y ago
The grsecurity team does have some valid criticisms of the upstream community, and of course they've done some brilliant technical work, but spender is unfortunately a pretty toxic community member who puts many upstream kernel devs to shame when it comes to ability to flame.
It's a shame - there's a lot of good stuff in grsec/PaX, but I think the upstream community is better off without the people involved. The KSPP effort to upstream grsec/PaX features is, of course, a good thing.
[disclaimer: upstream developer who lurks on kernel-hardening]
- technion 9y agoSimilarly, I used to run grsec on RedHat once upon a time. But the whole thing just got too hard. When a critical update came, I could get a stock kernel running "yum update", or I could play around building a whole new grsec kernel. I wish there was a way to take personalities out of this and let mainline merge the useful parts of grsec.
- OJFord 9y agoYour bio isn't a disclaimer.