3 ms·
Thanks for your response. I haven't read the Structuring Reducers page yet, though from a glance it looks thorough. I'm still using the docs as a reference and
by kakarot 9y ago
Thanks for your response.
I haven't read the Structuring Reducers page yet, though from a glance it looks thorough. I'm still using the docs as a reference and will probably be doing so for a while.
I'm not sure what it is in particular about the docs I have read, but somehow I came out feeling a little overwhelmed. I think the code wasn't explained well enough in some places, and while I understand the concepts behind Redux, it just seems a bit dense in areas. Also, and this may seem silly, but seeing another Todo app as an example was extremely off-putting and made it hard to pay attention to the example code. No one is ever making a Todo app with the tech they are learning and it's getting played out hard. Eventually I decided that a more hands-on tutorial is what I needed.
I've got the first link you mentioned in a tab somewhere, but since you wrote it I think I will start with Practical Redux today and see how it goes. I will try to pop in to Reactiflux tonight to share my progress.
Thank you so much for your help!
- acemarke 9y agoYeah, there's pros and cons to the proliferation of Todo apps in examples. On the one hand, a Todo app provides just enough of an implementation to demonstrate the basic concepts of a tool, without getting caught up in too much complexity. On the other hand, there's a ton of real-world use cases that a Todo app won't cover. It's a tough balance - teaching basic library/tool concepts vs actual usage. As for the help - you're welcome, and hopefully things click soon :)