> the article talks about robots replacing humans because of how great they are and then mentions unimpressive results True, but Yahoo! was still dominant for

> the article talks about robots replacing humans because of how great they are and then mentions unimpressive results True, but Yahoo! was still dominant for a while after search engines came on the scenes. There's always some lag, but trading is a lot more like searching the web than like driving a car. > Still seems that over any length of time, one should just go with index funds. Right now, those index funds are managed by humans based on indices built by humans. I reckon that they also have the potential to be cheaper when completely automated.