3 ms·
> So it's a hugely clickbaity title. The article provides no new evidence or even offer any possible causes as to the accident, it just details what happened an
by michael_storm 9y ago
> So it's a hugely clickbaity title. The article provides no new evidence or even offer any possible causes as to the accident, it just details what happened and wonders why.
That's how news works when something is still being investigated. And your comment proceeds to do the exact same thing: offer details about when happened, and then raise the same unanswered question that everyone has arrived at (including the article). So... what's your point, exactly?
- valuearb 9y agoThe clickbaity part is the title indicates the article is going to provide an answer. And I at least provided detailed possible issues that contributed to why the collision occurred, and why mysterious behavior occurred (the Crystal taking 30 minutes to turn around). My point is that the NY Times should offer me a high paid job to make their articles better.