4 ms·
It doesn't sound like you're talking about the same thing as anyone else. You're right that parking garages accommodate cars just fine, and nobody here is argui
by chc 9y ago
It doesn't sound like you're talking about the same thing as anyone else. You're right that parking garages accommodate cars just fine, and nobody here is arguing against parking garages.
- rayiner 9y agoI don't get your response. OP said that bannning cars downtown would keep families, disabled people, etc. from enjoying downtowns. My point is that you can ban general vehicle traffic in the core downtown areas, but people with families can still get there by parking in a garage just outside the downtown.
- chc 9y agoYou don't see any difference between banning cars and simply putting the parking spaces in a garage instead of on the street? The difference seems pretty stark to me — one implies that people cannot drive there and the other implies that people will drive there.
- rayiner 9y agoNo, my point about the garage is that you could easily ban parking in the main pedestrian area (Main Street, the waterfront, and the circle in Annapolis) because most people already park in a garage outside the main pedestrian zone. Many plans for downtown car bans contemplate parking outside the car free zone.
- Spooky23 9y agoIn the US, cars are privileged forms of transport. Just as we have shopping malls with outlying parking surrounding a pedestrian only area, you can engineer urban cores with appropriate pedestrian infrastructure, that are served with a network of transport modes outside of the core, including transit and garages.