5 ms·
Great article - unbelievable really. Is USB-C by all measures now superior to FireWire? Or are we still paying for Jobs' mistake?
by edzorg 9y ago
Great article - unbelievable really.
Is USB-C by all measures now superior to FireWire? Or are we still paying for Jobs' mistake?
- wtallis 9y agoUSB-C is just a connector. Some of the devices using that connector only support USB 2.0 signaling over that connector, so USB-C does not imply complete superiority over FireWire.
- walterbell 9y agoWhat protocols are commonly implemented by Intel host chipsets which support the USB-C connector, e.g. on a 2017 laptop?
- jsjohnst 9y agoThunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, USB 1.1-3.1, FireWire, HDMI, MHL, analog audio, power delivery
- walterbell 9y agoFireWire? That would have been a good addition to the article. Hopefully that will allow older FireWire devices to be used with a USB-C-to-Firewire adapter.
- pmarreck 9y agoA cursory google search did not reveal any USB-C to FireWire adapters; there are Thunderbolt 3 to 2 adapters (Thunderbolt 3 is basically USB-C version of Thunderbolt 2 which is Mini DisplayPort) and there are Thunderbolt 2 to FireWire adapters, so that combo may work
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- CydeWeys 9y agoDo you have an example of a device that only uses USB 2.0 over a USB-C connector? I wasn't aware of such a thing.
- mangix 9y agoAll phones with type c
- CydeWeys 9y agoNot true. My phone, a Pixel, has USB 3.1 Gen 1. The Galaxy S8 is also USB 3.1 but I'm unable to find which gen it is from five minutes' Googling.
- pitaj 9y agoSome smartphones.
- CydeWeys 9y agoOlder ones maybe. The latest generations of flagship phones use USB 3.1 over Type-C.
- samtoday 9y agoThe Nokia tablet is the first that comes to mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N1
- CydeWeys 9y agoThat's over two-and-a-half years old though. The kinds of devices using USB-C that are coming out nowadays are using USB 3.1.