3 ms·
Exactly! Fake parallax that just turn epic scenes and scenery into tabletop models. It's obvious, but why do they ruin their efforts like that. Don't they wat
by kpil 9y ago
Exactly!
Fake parallax that just turn epic scenes and scenery into tabletop models.
It's obvious, but why do they ruin their efforts like that. Don't they watch their own movies after post 3d editing?
I think even Avatar made it too far. I think I've whatched some animated films that didn't blow totally, but almost every other film that I have seen in 3d was a disappointment.
- mikeash 9y agoThis is complete speculation, but my guess is something like: the people who might understand this (skilled directors and such) are used to 2D and don't much care for 3D, and the people who push 3D (executives) are too obsessed with making things "pop" to realize what they're doing.
- KaiserPro 9y agoTrue 3D cameras are a massive pain in the arse Either they are huge, to get two cameras side by side, or they have a half-silvered mirror arrangement (with colour disparity) Add to that the rigs wobble (vomit inducing) and the distance between the cameras is far to wide, it all looks a bit poop, or requires a huge amount of post work to make fly. So the normal thing to do is manually cut out each object (rotoscope) and adjust the divergence to place it in 3d. every object, every frame. it mostly looks a bit poop. Not to mention is normally done quickly, like clash of the titans was converted in ~1 month.