3 ms·

I think that the one thing MS can claim to have done better with .NET is the fact that you can usually update the framework and notbreak your app. I have used s

by S_A_P 16y ago

I think that the one thing MS can claim to have done better with .NET is the fact that you can usually update the framework and notbreak your app. I have used several java apps that would break because I updated my java runtime. I don't really worry about that with .NET

barake 16y ago
That is because there are only really three versions of the framework out there: 1.1, 2.0 & 4.0. The compiler has changed (see: var, LINQ) and libraries have been added but the CLR hasn't changed much. Take a look at how C# implements lambdas - it's all compiler magic.
- borisk 16y ago
  Interesting, how else have you seen lambdas implemented in a compiled language?
- S_A_P 16y ago
  To which I say that is exactly my point. It's well thought out and there are essentially only 3 runtimes to target while still having modern language features. That said- I work in a .NET shop and work with my share of MSFT snobs that don't really see a world outside of .NET. I don't want to pin my career on that- so I try to stay reasonably current on non MSFT technology. Luckily it's mostly free. :)