3 ms·
I see your points about false accusations, but how many false accusations cases involve multiple accusers spanning back years?
by ithinkinstereo 9y ago
I see your points about false accusations, but how many false accusations cases involve multiple accusers spanning back years?
- handedness 9y agoI don't know, nor do I need to. That's the point. Serious accusations need to be tried in a manner that involves evidence, sworn testimony, counsel, etc., precisely because of their seriousness. In the meantime, online conjecture by parties with no standing should probably presume innocence until guilt is found, because a mob mentality should be beneath us. I know someone who was falsely accused of something serious–decades in prison type stuff–and the news coverage alone destroyed his business and put his family through hell. Anyone who's opposed to capital punishment because it prevents the accused from ever finding justice should also be concerned about the effects the court of public opinion can have on someone's life, and err on the side of withholding judgement when, again, there's no reason for us to judge this person unless we have direct dealings with the individual and need to make our own estimations out of self-interest. What's happening in this thread isn't about self-interest, it's about self-satisfaction. That's neither useful nor wise.
- ithinkinstereo 9y ago> What's happening in this thread isn't about self-interest, it's about self-satisfaction. That's neither useful nor wise. You're making a reasonable, but I would argue, pedantic argument (as it applies to this situation). Caldbeck is not being tried in a court of law, but in the court of public opinion. The standards are looser, that's just a part of living in a community with others, there is a natural bit of self-policing. It's part of our instinctual nature as humans; we pattern-match, it can get us in trouble at times, but it's gotten us this far as a species. If he is innocent he is free to defend himself and provide counter-evidence. He is being rightfully pilloried given the many claims, over a long period of time, against him. The abundance of evidence, must be considered. Look at the Bill Cosby case. Legally, innocent, but would you leave your daughter, wife, mother alone with someone with this kind of reputation?