Sure, if you want to actually explain your assumptions. When I hear that a guy was walking around, I don't usually start off by assuming that he had his face c

Sure, if you want to actually explain your assumptions. When I hear that a guy was walking around, I don't usually start off by assuming that he had his face covered and he was acting suspiciously. And I sure don't consider "the police arrested him" to be credible evidence about it, either. EDIT to respond to your reply: I guess we just won't see eye-to-eye on this. I've worn a bandanna as an accessory before, and I don't see anything wrong with walking around near a security fence, or even "checking it out." I completely disagree that those things on their own are suspicious enough to warrant arrest.