It started out good. Blockchains are of course awesome. But blockchains and all the usefulness entailed therein are independent of any one coin. Someone tomorro

It started out good. Blockchains are of course awesome. But blockchains and all the usefulness entailed therein are independent of any one coin. Someone tomorrow could come up with a coin with more versatility and awesome baked-in features than ETH. Someone could then create a coin later than does even better, and so on. The article starts good but then turns into FUD regarding modern currency. Decrying inflation in currency only further loses credibility to the author's argument. And then the author teases "And everyone will be wondering, why didn’t I see that coming? I wish I got in back then when everyone was missing the forest for the trees." What a disengenuous argument. This is essentially the Tulip analogy, except the author is unwittingly supporting it/