3 ms·

Here you are: https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/6f4d96c0-4062-11e7-b291-b499baebfeaf.html https://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/6f4d96c0-4062-11e7-b291-b4... aka Sa

• rsync 9y ago
  That's a samba vuln, not a FreeBSD vuln in particular ... Further, if you were worried about attackers or hardening a system, etc., you wouldn't be running samba (or anything like it). I'm talking about a remote-root vuln in the FreeBSD kernel or in any of the default system daemons that were bundled with an OS release (like openssh, crond, syslogd, etc.)
  • throwaway91111 9y ago
    In all honesty, there are probably both zero days for both BSDs (the software was written by humans after all) and great reasons to prefer them that don't involve this argument. I'd finger the "security ethos" of OpenBSD in particular.