Wait, so when it's your (side's) turn, you(r side) start(s) claiming "vulnerabilities can be independently discovered", but when it's my (side's) turn, your arg

Wait, so when it's your (side's) turn, you(r side) start(s) claiming "vulnerabilities can be independently discovered", but when it's my (side's) turn, your argument is "but there'd be no proof of concept"? So are you arguing people going to discover these independently anyway, or not? Pick one and stick with it. You can't have it both ways...