3 ms·

Is this a real concern of ordinary people? I am not a movie expert, just somebody who watches movies a lot and I have never thought to myself "this new movie wi

Is this a real concern of ordinary people? I am not a movie expert, just somebody who watches movies a lot and I have never thought to myself "this new movie with 48fps doesn't look like a movie, it's too lifelike, not cinematic enough". I assume people who think like that would be very marginal minority of movie experts. I don't believe average viewer would even think of such argument.

aninhumer 9y ago
It's not a technical argument they make, it's just a gut reaction to 48fps looking different. The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set. Personally I do think people will get over it eventually, especially for less "cinematic" stuff. Or possibly variable framerate will become a thing, and directors will choose different framerates for different effects.
- richardknop 9y ago
  I see. I remember seeing Hobbit movies for the first time and they looked slightly different from other movies. But to me it seemed like a better quality so I didn't complain. Though, I heard some people say that scenes in old LOTR movies looked more realistic. This was mostly because Hobbit used more CGI though, for example orcs in Hobbit movies were all CGI but before in LOTR they had real actors to play orcs.
- baby 9y ago
  > The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set. I personally didn't get that feeling either. Just got a feeling of "it looks better". Especially that dragon scene. > variable framerate will become a thing It already is a thing with slow motions, but it is not what you're thinking of. Have you ever tried to do slow motion with a 30fps video? It doesn't look good. So your idea will probably look bad, inserting 24fps sequences in a 60fps movie will just look laggy.
apetresc 9y ago
It's the opposite, actually. "Experts" are pushing for higher framerates, but "average viewers" complain that something feels wrong, home-video-y, and just plain weird on high-FPS movies. They can't put their finger on it, they certainly won't mention the framerate, but they tend not to like it.
- baby 9y ago
  Because ordinary people don't spend the time to appreciate it, it just look too different for them. Exactly how color movies looked too different at the time.
  - cududa 9y ago
    You're pretty wrong here. Critics panes color movies, consumers like them. This is the inverse of that.
    - baby 9y ago
      Not true. This pattern is the same you saw with iPhone "nobody would use that" or CDs or ipads, or video games or ... there are always people who are against progress.

aninhumer 9y ago

It's not a technical argument they make, it's just a gut reaction to 48fps looking different. The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set. Personally I do think people will get over it eventually, especially for less "cinematic" stuff. Or possibly variable framerate will become a thing, and directors will choose different framerates for different effects.

richardknop 9y ago
I see. I remember seeing Hobbit movies for the first time and they looked slightly different from other movies. But to me it seemed like a better quality so I didn't complain. Though, I heard some people say that scenes in old LOTR movies looked more realistic. This was mostly because Hobbit used more CGI though, for example orcs in Hobbit movies were all CGI but before in LOTR they had real actors to play orcs.
baby 9y ago
> The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set. I personally didn't get that feeling either. Just got a feeling of "it looks better". Especially that dragon scene. > variable framerate will become a thing It already is a thing with slow motions, but it is not what you're thinking of. Have you ever tried to do slow motion with a 30fps video? It doesn't look good. So your idea will probably look bad, inserting 24fps sequences in a 60fps movie will just look laggy.

apetresc 9y ago

It's the opposite, actually. "Experts" are pushing for higher framerates, but "average viewers" complain that something feels wrong, home-video-y, and just plain weird on high-FPS movies. They can't put their finger on it, they certainly won't mention the framerate, but they tend not to like it.

baby 9y ago
Because ordinary people don't spend the time to appreciate it, it just look too different for them. Exactly how color movies looked too different at the time.
- cududa 9y ago
  You're pretty wrong here. Critics panes color movies, consumers like them. This is the inverse of that.
  - baby 9y ago
    Not true. This pattern is the same you saw with iPhone "nobody would use that" or CDs or ipads, or video games or ... there are always people who are against progress.