> OK well here's the sort of ops work that serverless kinda absolves you of I wasn't trying to list every bit of ops work for server/serverless. My point is th

> OK well here's the sort of ops work that serverless kinda absolves you of I wasn't trying to list every bit of ops work for server/serverless. My point is that as a business you cannot expect that once you move to serverless you don't need anyone to manage it anymore, or that the time to manage it drops to zero. Yes, serverless does have its distinct advantages over rolling your own, there is no question about that. But serverless still requires experienced people to configure/manage/monitor it. I've seen way too many managers get giddy at the thought of having their developer/ops time completely free to perform other tasks, and that's not the case. You still have to budget for people and time to manage serverless architecture.