3 ms·
Before anyone else is confused while reading the article, this was published January 4th.
by janzer 9y ago
Before anyone else is confused while reading the article, this was published January 4th.
- CaliforniaKarl 9y agoYeah, I think Mr. Comet even said so in his recent testimony.
- aaron-lebo 9y agoComey's response six days later: Comey: DNC denied FBI's requests for access to hacked servers http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/313555-comey-fbi-did-request-access-to-hacked-dnc-servers http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/313555-comey-fbi... Who forgot to adjust their clock for leap half year?
- anigbrowl 9y agoYeah, not sure what OP's point in publishing a 6 month-old story is. Maybe amend the title to reflect that, I thought it was some new development and was also confused.
- 3131s 9y agoSix months ago would have been right during the most frantic moments of the election. A lot of people probably missed it. I already had to vouch for it, but I doubt this will survive another 10 minutes of the flagging / downvote brigade.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> Six months ago would have been right during the most frantic moments of the election. January 4 was about two months after the election, not “during the most frantic moments of the election.”
- anigbrowl 9y ago?!
- spamizbad 9y agoThese half-year old revelations are being signal boosted all over twitter by... individuals... not sure why this 6 month old information, which nobody cared about, is all of a sudden super relevant.