4 ms·
> people they ostensibly serve Should they submit to having no protection from a minority group of people who wish them harm? It really is not odd given the gr
by yazan94 9y ago
> people they ostensibly serve
Should they submit to having no protection from a minority group of people who wish them harm? It really is not odd given the gravity of the event and attendees
- mschuster91 9y ago> Should they submit to having no protection from a minority group of people who wish them harm? Look at how Jeremy Corbyn behaved - he went right to the victims of the London blaze. Theresa May, on the other side, did not. That's the difference between a politician with a spine and a walking disgrace clothed like a politician. And yes, both have about the same danger level - May because her politics caused that desaster in the first place and Corbyn because left-wing politicians have been murdered in UK before. So you can go directly to the population without tons of security, all it takes is guts.
- yazan94 9y agoI do understand what you're saying, but I don't think it is practical to ask for world leaders to drop their security detail. There will always be dissenters because you can't make everyone happy, that's nothing new. But with the risk (is it even still a risk when it's expected according to the article?) of violence breaking out, its not worth taking the chance