3 ms·
I agree that the point is interesting. Part of it is the differentness of the environment (high radiation, low temperature, microgravity, great distance). Thi
by mturmon 16y ago
I agree that the point is interesting.
Part of it is the differentness of the environment (high radiation, low temperature, microgravity, great distance). This necessitates a rethinking of design constraints at a fundamental physical level -- i.e. deriving system constraints from first principles.
Another part of it is the unique nature of a lot of the stuff we send out there -- rovers to Mars, planetary orbiters with exotic cameras, Earth-orbiting satellites with hyperspectral imagers or advanced radars, powerful telescopes with cryogenic optical/infrared cameras.
Here's an example (.mov):
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/video/movies/mer_ch_edl_TerrorComb.mov http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/video/movies/mer_ch_edl_Te...
from
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/video/challenges.html http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/video/challenges.html
- prawn 16y agoA building on water doesn't seem that different to the regular world for most of us. When most of what you see is on the surface (aerial shots of oil rig, smoke plumes, oil slick, etc), 95% of the population probably wouldn't realise that the rough stuff is happening over a kilometre under water.