Headline choice is perfectly fine. Not only is it 100% accurate, but it's also the germane information that leads to the following statement: > This would obvi

Headline choice is perfectly fine. Not only is it 100% accurate, but it's also the germane information that leads to the following statement: > This would obviously be a strong piece of support for Waymo’s case, since it establishes a timeline in which Uber was aware of Levandowski’s alleged actions even prior to finalizing their acquisition of Otto, which would in turn mean that Uber can’t claim to be completely separated from Levandowski’s actions.