Your comment sounded like this to me: > Yeah, you [DarkKomunalec] basically [use static typing to] make initial implementation easier at the expense of mainten

Your comment sounded like this to me: > Yeah, you [DarkKomunalec] basically [use static typing to] make initial implementation easier at the expense of maintenance and debugging It was not clear that "Yeah" was an approval (and not a dismissal), and it was not obvious that "you" was a general "you" (and not a personal "you" directed at DarkKomunalec). Nevertheless, you were still talking about a tradeoff, and I personally see none: in my experience, dynamic typing makes initial implementations harder (or longer), because so many errors are caught too late. Static type systems have a much tighter feedback loop.