4 ms·

Breitbart misrepresents research from 58 scientific papers about global warming

• sharemywin 9y ago
  A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Cherry-picking, Derogatory, Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading.
• Finnucane 9y ago
  "Breitbart article is bullshit" is pretty much taken as read, but letting the cited authors have a Marshall McCluhan moment ("you know nothing of my work") does hav e its own satisfaction. Too bad it won't be seen by as many people.
  • emvincent 9y ago
    33k social media shares for the Breitbart article, 15.1k for Climate Feedback's debunk + 6k for Snopes' (http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/ http://www.snopes.com/scientific-papers-global-warming-myth/), not too bad...
    • Finnucane 9y ago
      Are we assuming shares is proportional to total viewing?