2 ms·
Over the years I've done R&D as well as manufacturing engineering. The closer you are to the manufacturing end the tighter the processes are nailed down, you sh
by zwieback 9y ago
Over the years I've done R&D as well as manufacturing engineering. The closer you are to the manufacturing end the tighter the processes are nailed down, you should still learn for your mistakes but at all times have a controlled default. I'd say the F1 race is like that as well, if the low fuel case was not tried before, which surprises me, it should be a wake up call for the upstream R&D guys to better cover their process space. For the guys on race day it's a sign that process monitoring needs to be improved. Anyway, everyone should benefit in the end and most places I've been have had this attitude. When it comes to learning from your mistakes individuals have a wide set of reactions, though, and it's sometimes tough to swallow your pride and debug the problem in front of you instead of quickly moving on and trying again.
- woliveirajr 9y agoI don't read it as this wasn't tested before in R&D, but perhaps it was and gave no advantage, so was not considered. The mistake allowed them to look for other positive aspects that weren't considered before:taking the pole in circuits where the first corner is complicated and messy can be a big advantage (less risk of collision and ending the race in the same position is something good). Also making all those companies who pay a lot of money to put stickers on your car a little happier.