3 ms·
Ultimately, Uber did not want to establish a precedent for liability. What they should have done is settled for $4,000 and forced the victim to sign an NDA, ens
by iplaw 9y ago
Ultimately, Uber did not want to establish a precedent for liability. What they should have done is settled for $4,000 and forced the victim to sign an NDA, ensuring that this little conflict remained private.
Instead, in usual Uber fashion, the legal and HR team worked their magic and created a lose-lose-lose situation for themselves:
1. They established precedent for liability;
2. They obstructed justice, which could be used as fodder in subsequent lawsuits; and
3. They did nothing to prevent this story from being broadcasted far and wide.
- gpm 9y agoI don't believe ruling before a magistrate judge in small claims court create precedent in a legal sense, though if you just mean it will inspire others to do the same, agreed.