4 ms·
The problem they claim to address is real. However, the product not really addresses it. It's too close to email and existing messengers. [ Problem ] - Meetin
by alfra 9y ago
The problem they claim to address is real. However, the product not really addresses it. It's too close to email and existing messengers.
[ Problem ]
- Meetings have the potential to really keep a team together
- Teams are distributed throughout geography, time zones or daily life patterns
- So how to bring GOOD meetings online, and perhaps even make them asynchronous?
"Meetings" come in different flavors, for example
- Weekly or monthly meetings to look back, learn, and discuss how to move on
- Daily scrum / daily standup to get a shared view of the day
- Ad hoc meetings to address a smaller but immediate issue
- Water cooler meetings which allow for serendipity
...
So for meetings in person, the real challenge is to get everyone attending, even if there is lot of urgent / important work to do. On the flip side: Keep the signal / noise ratio of the meeting so everyone feels it's time well spent.
[ Solution ]
So my vision for a better tool would include:
- Separation of reading mode and writing mode. You should be able to write in the sense of offloading thoughts without the need / option to read through everyone else's notes at the same time
- Asynchronous default. Stuff you write should be considered a draft until intentionally "published" (exception: urgent stuff
/ water cooler stuff). That would allow revising bigger thoughts before a "meeting".
- Even asynchronous, virtual meetings should have schedules. So for "daily" meetings, there should be a function that makes sure that everyone reads and writes at least once a day. For "monthly" at least once a month, but without that becoming a continuous "monthly meeting", which wouldn't allow to really focus on it.