Anarcho-capitalism is a theoretical political structure which has never been attempted. But I fail to see how that's relevant to the discussion. Seems like a re

Anarcho-capitalism is a theoretical political structure which has never been attempted. But I fail to see how that's relevant to the discussion. Seems like a red herring to me. It was originally alleged that corporations hold all the power in an economy unless they are kept in line by a powerful government. I countered, stating consumers actually are the holders of power in a free economy and provided some praxeological arguments to support that claim. @s73ver then made a generic claim that history refutes my argument, without providing a single example. One merely has to provide an example of a corporation which yielded more economic power than the consumer in a free-market economy. > Can't prove a negative, you know. You gotta prove positives. I really have no idea what negative you're talking about here.