2 ms·
That's a hyper generalization. Some morals like no tolerance against sexual harassment are not relative.
by sidcool 9y ago
That's a hyper generalization. Some morals like no tolerance against sexual harassment are not relative.
- csomar 9y agoYou mean legally? I'm pretty sure there are people on this universe that differ from you (and many of them act on it)
- sidcool 9y agoAnd that's because morals are not policed. People will always abuse power. Hence Laizze free is impractical and we all need oversight.
- csomar 9y agoI think you mean policing "law" better. Policing "morals" is not possible since as I mentioned morals are relative. It is a dangerous thing if Police or state actors act on moral rather than law.
- _jal 9y agoI can't think of a way to take this statement that makes it true. I don't know how old you are, but public morality towards sexual harassment just in the U.S. has changed in my lifetime. (For the better, although it is currently ugly and messy, as these changes always are.) Even attitudes about what constitute harassment vary by culture between similar cultures. Compare Italy and Germany.