4 ms·

I'm curious how much Kalanick has already taken off the table. That may be a motivating factor in his decision. If he has already pocketed hundreds of million

I'm curious how much Kalanick has already taken off the table. That may be a motivating factor in his decision. If he has already pocketed hundreds of millions, he may understand that this could well be the death of the company, but just isn't motivated enough to fight these investors and is willing to let them burn the company to the ground. I wouldn't go as far as to say he doesn't care anymore, but being forced out of your job and the potential evaporation of billions in paper wealth isn't such a catastrophe if you already have enough money for several lifetimes in the bank.

bigtones 9y ago
Kalanick has stated publicly that he has not sold a single share - so he has actually taken no money off the table whatsoever.
- downandout 9y ago
  I hadn't heard that. When did he state this, and is it still accurate as of today? It's possible he sold shares in the last few weeks during the run-up to this decision. Or maybe he hasn't sold shares, but there are other ways that he could have profited handsomely from Uber already. Cash bonuses, private sale of options (has he said he hasn't sold an option?) etc. I'm just saying if he has enough in the bank, he may have decided it wasn't worth it to fight his investors, the media, and basically everyone else that has jumped on the anti-Kalanik bandwagon.
  - noway421 9y ago
    http://video.vanityfair.com/watch/the-new-establishment-summit-the-world-of-uber http://video.vanityfair.com/watch/the-new-establishment-summ... 33:45 It's actually would be a major news point I think. Whether or not Travis sells his shares is what's gonna be decisive of his position in the company and possible future ambitions.
- usrusr 9y ago
  Surely a company with billions of valuation will pay a decent CEO salary even if said CEO happens to be the founder / main shareholder?
- baybal2 9y ago
  PROTIP: Shareholder loan
- ridgeguy 9y ago
  Perhaps he pledged a small fraction of his shares to collateralize a non-recourse loan. This is one way to monetize equity without selling it. The lender takes the risks as to share value and liquidity. If presented early in Uber's climbing valuation curve, it probably would have looked like a good opportunity to lenders.
kulu2002 9y ago
Exactly what I think!

bigtones 9y ago

Kalanick has stated publicly that he has not sold a single share - so he has actually taken no money off the table whatsoever.

downandout 9y ago
I hadn't heard that. When did he state this, and is it still accurate as of today? It's possible he sold shares in the last few weeks during the run-up to this decision. Or maybe he hasn't sold shares, but there are other ways that he could have profited handsomely from Uber already. Cash bonuses, private sale of options (has he said he hasn't sold an option?) etc. I'm just saying if he has enough in the bank, he may have decided it wasn't worth it to fight his investors, the media, and basically everyone else that has jumped on the anti-Kalanik bandwagon.
- noway421 9y ago
  http://video.vanityfair.com/watch/the-new-establishment-summit-the-world-of-uber http://video.vanityfair.com/watch/the-new-establishment-summ... 33:45 It's actually would be a major news point I think. Whether or not Travis sells his shares is what's gonna be decisive of his position in the company and possible future ambitions.
usrusr 9y ago
Surely a company with billions of valuation will pay a decent CEO salary even if said CEO happens to be the founder / main shareholder?
baybal2 9y ago
PROTIP: Shareholder loan
ridgeguy 9y ago
Perhaps he pledged a small fraction of his shares to collateralize a non-recourse loan. This is one way to monetize equity without selling it. The lender takes the risks as to share value and liquidity. If presented early in Uber's climbing valuation curve, it probably would have looked like a good opportunity to lenders.

kulu2002 9y ago

Exactly what I think!