5 ms·
Interesting, to move from an Elon-Musk-chaired non-profit to an Elon-Musk-owned for-profit.
by komaromy 9y ago
Interesting, to move from an Elon-Musk-chaired non-profit to an Elon-Musk-owned for-profit.
- komaromy 9y agoAlso, this is very impressive for someone who finished his PhD less than two years ago.
- skadamat 9y agoI don't think he ever intended to stay at OpenAI long to be honest. He was a founding scientist of the nonprofit, so think he went there to do his time before he found an interesting opportunity (either in academia because he just finished his PhD or in industry)
- unityByFreedom 9y agoOpen AI was always a pipeline for Musk. Use other people's donations to attract and identify the talent, then move them under his payroll. I guess that's a win win for the employees and for Musk. Not sure how many other supporters Open AI has, though I doubt that's what they had in mind when they donated to support that effort.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- jfoster 9y agoWorth noting that OpenAI may not otherwise exist. It mightn't be precisely ideal, but I think it's broadly a 3-way win.
- unityByFreedom 9y agoTheir mission, to add more open source tools to the ai space, is already being accomplished by for-profit companies like Google and Facebook. If it weren't attached to Musk, and if Tesla never hired from them, I'd agree it's good to have a non-profit in the mix. As it is, if it looks and acts like a pipeline for talent, it's a pipeline for talent.
- nsturis 9y agoIt's not like Musk doesn't donate to OpenAI himself..
- unityByFreedom 9y agoThat he spends money to find talent for his own company isn't so surprising. He's just done it in a new, slightly abstract way
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]