The first question is to ask what does it cost to train someone? There are always costs to having someone on site. If the return on investment in the training p

The first question is to ask what does it cost to train someone? There are always costs to having someone on site. If the return on investment in the training program covers the cost of the training, one has a case for saying the arrangement is fair. On the other hand, if the compensation vastly outweighs what it costs to train, then we have a case that this is just greed on the part of the training organisation. In the case highlighted above, one would say that he is not getting trained at all but is simply being used as free labour. In which case, one would be justified in highlighting the nature of the company anonymously to all and sundry. One is also justified in leaving the company graciously publicly so as to not hinder one's future. Using the Streisand Effect can be an effective tool in improving the general behaviour of all.